ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Distance Visual Outcomes of Trifocal Intraocular Lenses in Highly Myopic Eyes Without Myopic Maculopathy.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the refractive and visual distance outcomes of trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in highly myopic patients and to investigate potential preoperative factors predictors of postoperative vision. Methods: This retrospective study included eyes with axial length (AL) between 26 mm and 31mm without signs of pathological myopia and a preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) equal or better than 0.1 logMAR who underwent diffractive trifocal IOL implantation (AT LISA tri or FineVision). Visual and refractive measurements, as well as biometric values (AL, anterior chamber depth, keratometry, white-to-white) were recorded both preoperatively and postoperatively. Comparisons were performed between eyes achieving predefined CDVA (0.0 logMAR or better) and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (0.2 logMAR or better) thresholds and those that did not. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify preoperative factors associated with these thresholds. Results: The study included 361 eyes with a mean preoperative CDVA of 0.03±0.04 logMAR, which significantly improved to 0.01±0.03 logMAR postoperatively (p<0.001). The mean postoperative spherical equivalent was -0.26 ± 0.40 D, with 80.1% of the eyes within ± 0.50 D range. Overall, 19.9% and 18.9% of eyes did not achieve 0.0 logMAR CDVA and 0.2 logMAR UDVA, respectively, and 8% required postoperative corneal refractive enhancement. Besides subtle differences, no determinant preoperative biometric parameters were significantly associated with postoperative distance vision outcomes. Conclusions: Trifocal IOLs performed satisfactorily in terms of distance vision in highly myopic eyes without signs of pathological myopia; however nearly one-fifth of eyes did not achieve the expected visual acuity, highlighting the importance of careful patient selection and appropriate preoperative counselling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.