ArticleJournal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects2026
Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery Using Tomographic Guides Combined with Functional Impression: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Deviations between virtually planned and placed implants are still reported in guided implant surgery in completely edentulous arches. Associating a functional impression with the tomographic guide may enhance guide retention and reduce deviations. This study evaluated the effect of using a functional impression during tomographic image acquisition on the accuracy of implant placement in the edentulous maxilla. Methods: Fourteen 3D-printed edentulous maxillary models were fabricated. A complete denture was designed and printed for use as a tomographic guide for each model. During dual-scan image acquisition, the experimental group's tomographic guides were seated with a light-body silicone functional impression, whereas the control group was scanned without impression material (n=7). After image registration in Blue Sky Plan software, implants were virtually planned, and surgical guides were printed for the placement of six implants per model. Postoperative scans were obtained, and STL files of planned and placed implants were superimposed to measure linear and angular deviations. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA for functional impression and implant region (α=0.05). Results: No statistically significant differences were found regarding the effects of functional impression or implant position ( Conclusion: The accuracy of implant positioning in edentulous maxillae was not significantly affected by the incorporation of a functional impression during tomographic scanning or by the implant region, although deviations were still observed. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the potential benefits of this approach in specific clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.