Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42807353›Full record

ArticleStatistics and computing2026

Rare event ABC-SMC

Ivis Kerama, Thomas Thorne, Richard G Everitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ivis KeramaDepartment of Economics, University of Exeter, Rennes Drive, Exeter, EX4 4PU UK.
Thomas ThorneComputer Science Research Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH UK.
Richard G EverittDepartment of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) is a well-established family of Monte Carlo methods for performing approximate Bayesian inference in the case where an "implicit" model is used for the data: when the data model can be simulated, but the likelihood cannot easily be pointwise evaluated. A fundamental property of standard ABC approaches is that the number of Monte Carlo points required to achieve a given accuracy scales exponentially with the dimension of the data. Prangle et al. (2018) proposes a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method that uses a rare event sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) approach to estimating the ABC likelihood that avoids this exponential scaling, and thus allows ABC to be used on higher dimensional data. This paper builds on the work of Prangle et al. (2018) by using the rare event SMC approach within an SMC algorithm, instead of within an MCMC algorithm. The new method has a similar structure to SMC

Indexed as

Bayesian inferenceMonte CarloSimulation-based inference

Identifiers

PMID42807353
PMCPMC13616861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.