ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Mobility-informed hospital siting for accessible and lower-carbon healthcare travel: an ensemble learning study in Tianjin, China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare facility layouts shape access to care, travel burdens, and travel-related carbon emissions. Conventional siting assessments, however, often rely on supply-side indicators without accounting for how patients actually travel. This study examined nine tertiary Grade-A hospitals in central Tianjin using 2,596 questionnaires from hospital visitors and spatial data on road networks, bus and metro stations, expressways, and points of interest. Six spatial and transport indicators were evaluated: surveyed medical-visitor density, regional service coverage, transport accessibility, distance to expressways, public transit coverage, and road network density. An ensemble framework dominated by a graph convolutional network was used to predict supply-demand relationships between respondents and hospitals and to compare scenarios in terms of service utility, travel efficiency, and lower-carbon performance. Respondents generally reported a travel tolerance of within 20 km and 60 min, while their willingness to use direct public transport declined as the number of stops increased. The ensemble achieved a reported validation accuracy above 90% under the study's validation procedure. Among the scenarios evaluated, J1 combined medium surveyed medical-visitor density, high service coverage, high accessibility, greater distance from expressways, high public transit coverage, and medium road network density. This scenario had the lowest relative carbon-emission level. By incorporating observed mobility constraints, the framework may support more accessible and lower-carbon planning of urban public-health infrastructure. Because the analysis uses a hospital-based survey from one city, broader application requires population-based data and external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.