ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2026
Validation of Osteoporosis associated SNPs candidates from Decisive Gene Strategy using Taiwan Biobank.
Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decisive gene strategy (DGS) has been developed and identified 21 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with osteoporosis (OP). This study aimed to further evaluate whether DGS is a suitable candidate strategy to identify the relationship between SNPs and OP using Taiwan Biobank (TWB). A total of 26,225 samples were retrieved from TWB between 2008 and 2021, comprising 4,749 osteoporosis (T-score ≤ -2.5) and 21,476 controls (T-score ≥ -1.0) based on their T-score of bone mineral density (BMD). Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between 21 SNPs from DGS and OP risk by using TWB data. The alignment of 21 SNPs from DGS with TWB genotyping chip found 11 identical SNPs. Among the 11 identical SNPs, seven showed results consistent with prior DGS evidence, including ESR1 rs9340799, OPG rs2073617, VDR rs731236, rs7975232, and rs1544410, IL6 rs1800795, and IGF1 rs5742612 [OR: 1.01, 1.03, 1.06, 1.01, 1.10, 0.72, 1.02; 95% CI= 0.94-1.09, 0.97-1.10, 0.93-1.22, 0.94-1.07, 0.97-1.26, 0.32-1.64, 0.96-1.09, respectively]. Furthermore, OPG T245G rs3134069 showed a borderline nominal association with osteoporosis in TWB [OR: 1.09, 95% CI= 1.00-1.19]), suggesting a potential population-specific signal. Our TWB validation of the 11 identical SNPs supports DGS as an effective methodology and, beyond replication, provides a novel framework for examining the relationship between SNPs and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.