ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026
Dietary polyphenols and nutritional modulators in glioblastoma: mechanistic promise and translational barriers.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the deadliest primary brain tumor, and fewer than 7% of patients survive 5 years even after surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Several features make it difficult to treat: the tumor heterogeneity, it adapts quickly to resist drugs, and the blood-brain barrier keeps most agents from reaching it. These obstacles have renewed interest in adjuncts to standard care. Dietary polyphenols and certain nutritional compounds are among the candidates, since they can influence oxidative stress, inflammation, tumor metabolism, and the glioblastoma stem cells that drive recurrence. This review weighs the mechanistic, preclinical, and early clinical evidence for major polyphenols (curcumin, resveratrol, EGCG, quercetin, apigenin), non-polyphenol agents (omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin D, melatonin), and dietary patterns such as ketogenic, anti-inflammatory, and caloric restriction approaches. Across models these agents act on familiar oncogenic and stress pathways, including NF-κB, STAT3, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and MAPK, curbing proliferation and invasion, triggering apoptosis, and sensitizing tumors to temozolomide and radiation. What the laboratory shows has rarely reached patients. Poor oral absorption, inconsistent brain penetration, heavy first-pass metabolism, individual variability, and a shortage of biomarker-guided trials stand in the way. We do not propose these agents as substitutes for treatment. Instead, we connect their biological promise to the pharmacokinetic, delivery, and trial design problems that decide whether they can ever help, treating them strictly as experimental adjuncts. By covering polyphenols, other nutritional agents, and whole dietary patterns together, the review offers a translational picture that earlier reviews have missed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.