ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Habitat suitability and active component responses of
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: Future climate projections under multiple Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios, land-use dynamics, HPLC fingerprint data, and ensemble species distribution models were integrated to evaluate the habitat suitability, medicinal quality, and conservation priorities of Results: Climate variables, particularly Bio18, Bio11, and Bio08, were identified as the dominant drivers of habitat suitability, whereas land-use change exerted comparatively limited effects on habitat dynamics. Future climate change was projected to expand the overall suitable habitat of E. senticosus in Heilongjiang Province while reducing the extent of highly suitable habitats. The areas with high contents of the five major bioactive compounds, namely coniferin, syringin, eleutheroside E, isofraxidin, and syringaresinol-4'-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, were all projected to increase under future climate scenarios. Priority conservation analysis based on habitat suitability showed that existing nature reserves covered only 12.899% of the identified priority conservation areas. Wild tending priority areas, identified by integrating habitat suitability and medicinal component distributions, were mainly concentrated in the Lesser Khingan Mountains under current climate conditions but were projected to shift toward the western Lesser Khingan Mountains under future climate change. Discussion: These findings provide theoretical support for the conservation, wild tending, standardized management, and sustainable utilization of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.