Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42807252›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Toward reliable computer-aided brain tumor diagnosis: a contrast-enhanced deep learning approach with hybrid KNN classification.

Krithika Pandurangan, Doddi Chandana Gowri, Jonnla Naga Surekha, Pratiksha V Chafle, Kolagotla Venkateswara Reddy, Shonak Bansal, Krishna Prakash, Md Shabiul Islam, Mohammad Tariqul Islam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Krithika PanduranganDepartment of MBA, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Doddi Chandana GowriDepartment of CSE, SRM University, Amaravathi, India.
Jonnla Naga SurekhaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Dr RVR NRI Institute of Technology (Deemed to be University), Eluru, India.
Pratiksha V ChafleDepartment of CSE, G H Raisoni University Amravati, Maharashtra, India.
Kolagotla Venkateswara ReddyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Lakireddy Balireddy College of Engineering, Vijayawada, India.
Shonak BansalDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Punjab, India.
Krishna PrakashDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Md Shabiul IslamCentre for Advanced Devices and Systems, Centre of Excellence for Robotics and Sensing Technologies, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohammad Tariqul IslamDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, UKM Bangi, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timely and accurate diagnosis of brain tumors using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a major concern in neuro-oncology because of the potential effects of delayed and inconsistent radiological diagnoses on the management of such diseases. Manual analysis of MRIs is time-consuming and highly susceptible to observer variations; thus, there is a need for computer-based and more consistent diagnostic processes. In this study, an automatic diagnostic process based on deep learning was proposed using multiscale contrast enhancement along with lightweight convolutional features and classifiers for diagnosing four classes of brain tumors. The MRI images were analyzed using a Multi-scale Intensity Contrast Amplification (MICA) algorithm that enhances the relevant structural information of the tumors across fine, intermediate, and coarse spatial scales. The refined images were then fed into an in-house convolutional neural network (CNN) backbone architecture that uses depth-wise separable convolution, residual skip connection, and squeeze-and-excitation (SE) attention mechanism to extract compact and discriminative feature representations. To select the optimal decision layer for this representation, three supervised learning methods, namely K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF), were trained on this set of features and compared with the softmax head of the CNN. The experiments were performed on a publicly available, three-source combined MRI dataset of 7,023 images across glioma, meningioma, pituitary tumor, and normal categories using both hold-out and 5-fold cross-validation setups. In all the evaluated configurations, the hybrid model of CNN and KNN provided the best hold-out accuracy (96.58%), whereas the hybrid model of CNN and SVM offered the best macro-average precision (98.81%) and area under the ROC curve (99.56%). Both hybrids were statistically superior (

Indexed as

brain tumorsconvolutional neural networksmagnetic resonance imagingmulti-scale contrast enhancementsupervised learning approaches

Identifiers

PMID42807252
PMCPMC13616713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.