ArticleBiology of sport2026
An innovative RPE-based approach using machine learning to analyse starter and substitute training load in soccer.
Article in Biology of sport, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current methods to distinguish starters from substitutes are typically based on playing time. Not considering the physical demands and internal load of different positions can lead to ineffective training and recovery protocols. The aim of this study was to examine whether a k-means clustering approach applied to session-RPE can generate role-specific thresholds that meaningfully differentiate match load profiles between starters and substitutes. We analysed 1,450 player-matches from four professional Italian Serie A teams, using video match analysis to measure total distance (TD) and high-intensity activities: metabolic power events (MPE), high-speed running (HSR), and sprint running (SR). Players were divided based on the role as follows: forwards (FWs), midfielders (MFs), full-backs (FBs), and centre-backs (CBs). Individualized sRPE zones (low, medium, high) were identified with the K-means clustering approach discriminating starters from substituted. FWs, MFs, and FBs were considered substituted, and compensatory training was recommended when the sRPE was within the medium sRPE zone or lower (FWs ≤ 695 a.u., MFs ≤ 711 a.u., and FBs ≤ 726 a.u.). Compensatory training particularly focused on SR was recommended at sRPE = low for FWs (≤ 326.1 a.u.), and at a sRPE ≤ medium for MFs (≤ 711 a.u.). CBs were defined as starters when reporting sRPE values ≥ medium sRPE (> 446 a.u.), and SR training was always recommended. The proposed sRPE-based k-means approach distinguishes fatigued from non-fatigued players, guiding decisions about who should prioritise recovery. Role-specific sprint recommendations help coaches provide appropriate high-velocity exposure to prevent hamstring injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.