ReviewFrontiers in plant science2026
Root system architecture remodeling under oxygen-mediated subsurface drip irrigation: a mechanistic hypothesis framework linking multiphase mass transfer to root foraging decisions.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As climate variability and water scarcity intensify, subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) has emerged as a key water-saving technology across arid and semiarid regions. However, in practice, the wetted soil volume around each emitter remains close to saturation, disrupting the continuity of the soil gas phase and restricting oxygen diffusion into the root zone. Subsequently, the water and oxygen supplies may compete for the same pore space, which is an intrinsic constraint of SDI. Aerated SDI, particularly systems that use micro- and nanobubbles (MNBs), has shown potential to improve crop yield and water-saving performance, although the effects vary with soil, crop, and management conditions. A unified, cross-scale account of the influence of these engineered gas-liquid inputs on root system architecture (RSA) remodeling remains lacking. Therefore, based on the optimal foraging theory (OFT), we propose an oxygen-mediated root foraging cost framework as a working mechanism hypothesis. This framework treats oxygen not as a growth-promoting factor per se, but as a candidate regulatory variable that may modulate the metabolic cost of root resource acquisition; the sensing-signaling-response chain linking local oxygen gradients to architectural decisions remains to be causally validated. By altering foraging costs, oxygen availability may alter how roots perceive, trade off, and invest in heterogeneous underground resources. Guided by this framework, this review first traces how SDI has evolved technologically, from supplying water through the liquid phase to coupling gas and liquid through MNBs. It then examines how local oxygen gradients may be sensed through upstream oxygen-sensing pathways (including the N-end rule pathway), reactive oxygen species (ROS), nitric oxide (NO), and downstream ethylene-auxin interactions, and how these signals may shape patterns of RSA investment under localized SDI conditions, and proposes the root foraging-accessible domain (FAD) as a candidate concept for evaluating the spatial compatibility between root foraging and the coupled water-oxygen environment. The present evidence supports this conceptual framework, but field-scale causal validation, separation of oxygen effects from confounding factors (nutrients, mechanical impedance, microbial activity), and techno-economic evaluation of aerated SDI remain necessary before the framework can guide irrigation practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.