SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
The impact of social support on anxiety and depression under the context of COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic created an extreme and prolonged context of collective stress while simultaneously disrupting ordinary sources of interpersonal support. Although social support is widely associated with better mental health, it remains unclear how consistently this association was observed across populations and contexts during the pandemic and what the findings may imply for future crisis preparedness. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Taylor & Francis Online, ScienceDirect, and ERIC) were searched for studies published between February 2020 and June 2022. Eligible studies quantitatively examined the association between social support and anxiety and/or depression using validated measures. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled correlations, with subgroup, sensitivity, and publication bias analyses conducted. Results: Sixty studies comprising 64,693 participants met inclusion criteria. Social support was significantly associated with lower anxiety (ρ = -0.30, 95% CI [-0.33, -0.26]) and lower depression (ρ = -0.33, 95% CI [-0.37, -0.27]). Subgroup analyses showed consistent protective effects across age groups and occupations, particularly among college students and medical workers. Family support demonstrated the strongest associations. Heterogeneity was high (I Conclusion: Higher social support was consistently associated with lower anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Viewed as evidence from an extreme and prolonged context of collective stress, these findings may inform mental health preparedness for future public health emergencies and other large-scale crises. However, substantial heterogeneity indicates that the magnitude of the association varies across populations and contexts. Because the pooled estimates were based on bivariate correlations, the findings should not be interpreted as evidence that social support causally was associated with lower symptoms of specific pandemic-related stressors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.