ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Comparison of Postoperative Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations, Asphericity, Densitometry, and Optical Quality Between SMILE Pro and LASIK: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare postoperative changes in corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), densitometry, and optical quality following SMILE Pro and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and to investigate the relationship between corneal densitometry and postoperative optical quality. Patients and Methods: This retrospective matched cohort study included 60 eyes of 30 patients who underwent SMILE Pro and 60 eyes of 30 age-, sex-, and preoperative spherical equivalent-matched patients who underwent LASIK for myopia at Hanamizuki Eye Clinic between July 2025 and March 2026. Anterior, posterior, and real corneal HOAs, spherical aberration (SA), coma, anterior corneal Q value, and central (0-4 mm) corneal densitometry were evaluated using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA2). Optical quality was assessed using the modulation transfer function (MTF) Area Ratio (Total and HO) obtained with the OPD-Scan III. Longitudinal comparisons were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, and correlations were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Results: Compared with LASIK, the SMILE Pro group showed significantly lower posterior corneal coma at 1 week, lower anterior and real SA at 1 month, and lower anterior and real SA as well as real corneal coma at 3 months (all P<0.05). Q values were significantly lower at 1 and 3 months. Corneal densitometry was significantly higher in the SMILE Pro group at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months (all P<0.05), whereas the 3-month MTF Area Ratio Total was significantly lower (P=0.004). Within the SMILE Pro group, corneal densitometry at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months was significantly negatively correlated with the 3-month MTF Area Ratio HO (all P<0.05), whereas no significant correlations were observed in the LASIK group. Conclusion: Compared with LASIK, SMILE Pro was associated with fewer postoperative corneal HOAs and better preservation of corneal asphericity. Although higher-order optical quality was comparable between the two procedures, postoperative corneal densitometry was associated with higher-order optical quality only after SMILE Pro. These findings suggest that anterior segment OCT-derived corneal densitometry may provide additional noninvasive information on postoperative stromal interface healing and its relationship with optical quality following SMILE Pro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.