Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42807110›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The relational ground of emotion: an Ubuntu-based critique of individualist ontology in theories of emotion.

Şeyma Sevgican Yardımcı

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Şeyma Sevgican YardımcıDepartment of Psychology, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion studies increasingly recognize the decisive role of cultural context in emotional experience. However, this acceptance rests on an unquestioned ontological assumption that an individual subject experiences emotions, and that culture shapes this subject from the outside. This study aims to ontologically challenge this assumption within the context of small-scale traditional communities in Africa. This study, conducted using critical review methodology and PRISMA 2020 reporting standards, searched the Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases. 57 qualitative and theoretical studies meeting the inclusion criteria were evaluated. The included studies address ritual practices, collective identity, social norms, and cosmological belief systems as cultural contexts of emotion. The findings reveal that emotions in these communities are not individual experiences shaped by culture, but relational processes rooted in collective networks. The Ubuntu philosophy principle, "A person is a person through other persons," ontologically positions emotional experience as inseparable from collective existence. These findings indicate that the individualistic ontology underlying current emotion theories is not only a cultural limitation but also an epistemological constraint of the field. An Ubuntu-centered theoretical model comprising four components (relational ontology, ritualistic-performative emotion production, cosmological appraisal, and decolonial epistemology) is proposed alongside eight testable propositions for future empirical research.

Indexed as

collective emotioncultural psychologydecolonial psychologyemotionritual-based emotionUbuntu philosophy

Identifiers

PMID42807110
PMCPMC13617129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.