ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
PMSPA-Net framework with geometric region decomposition for high-precision phenotyping of field-grown maize seedlings.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate extraction of maize seedling phenotypes is essential for early growth assessment, yet field-grown seedlings exhibit complex backgrounds, non-rigid leaf deformation, self-occlusion, and adhered leaves that challenge three-dimensional point-cloud analysis. Methods: Here, we developed a workflow integrating PMSPA-Net, an enhanced PointNet++ model, with geometric region decomposition for semantic and organ-level segmentation of field-grown maize seedlings. Multi-view RGB images of 65 complete plants were reconstructed with OpenMVS, and all data were partitioned at the whole-plant level before point-block sampling. Fifteen plants were retained as a fixed independent test set, while the remaining samples were used for training and validation across three predefined random seeds. Results: Under a common protocol, PMSPA-Net outperformed PointNet, PointNet++, DGCNN, and RandLA-Net, achieving an mIoU of 0.8286 ± 0.0149, a macro-F1 of 0.8981 ± 0.0238, and a balanced accuracy of 0.9561 ± 0.0223. A four-configuration ablation study showed complementary gains from the multi-scale spatial pyramid attention module and IOA-based hyperparameter optimization. Geometric region decomposition also achieved more accurate and complete adhered-leaf separation than DBSCAN in three annotated cases. Point-cloud-derived leaf length and width agreed well with manual measurements. Discussion: This workflow demonstrates the feasibility of integrated semantic and organ-level phenotyping under the evaluated field conditions; validation across additional sites, developmental stages, and acquisition conditions is required before broader generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.