ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
MRI-based anatomical and biomechanical characterization of the human masticatory muscles.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomechanical models of the masticatory muscles quantify the complex force and movement patterns of the masticatory system and are essential for evidence-based diagnosis, treatment planning, and prosthetic care in the craniomandibular region. This study provides comprehensive, sex-specific parameters for assessing the morphology of the masticatory muscles in young adult males and females, based on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images and semi-automatic three-dimensional (3D) segmentation. Parameters such as volume, length, anatomical cross-sectional area and surface area of the masseter muscle, pterygoid muscle and temporalis muscle are evaluated bilaterally. Their force application points on the skull and mandible are determined using a new center-of-mass-based segmentation method for biomechanical model interpretation. Statistical analysis indicates that 66 of 68 parameters show significant sex-specific differences, mostly with large effect sizes: male participants generally showed higher volumes, lengths, and cross-sectional areas, except for two cross-sectional areas of the superficialis masseter muscle, resulting in higher surface-to-volume ratios in women. Although minor asymmetrical effects are observed, no significant lateral differences are found within each sex, suggesting bilateral symmetry of the masticatory muscles in the study cohort. Comparing volume data with existing literature shows that this study's data generally exceeds historical cadaver measurements but is consistent with recent digital studies, underscoring the influence of age, methodology, and sex-specific differences on the interpretation of morphometric muscle parameters. Overall, this research provides a valuable foundation for the morphometric characterization and sex-specific biomechanical modeling of the masticatory musculature, while also highlighting the limitations of small, unbalanced, and mixed-sex reference groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.