ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Nature-inspired multi-objective artificial intelligence for short-horizon volatility-regime early warning and defensive asset allocation.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early warning of market turbulence is usually treated as a classification problem, yet a usable system must also produce trustworthy probabilities, stay parsimonious and convert forecasts into defensible positions. We formulate that joint problem as a seven-objective optimisation task in which indicator selection, ridge-logistic regularization, decision threshold, calibration temperature and five defensive-allocation controls are tuned together, and we compare eleven metaheuristics under identical budgets on daily SPY and VIX data from January 2015 to February 2020. The target is a short-horizon volatility-regime exceedance: whether the VIX rises above its rolling 80th percentile within five trading days. Each experiment was repeated over 30 runs and benchmarked against a random-search control, nine conventional strategies, five rolling origins and five alternative stress definitions, with Friedman tests, Holm-corrected pairwise comparisons, effect sizes and bootstrap intervals. In the validation objective space the metaheuristics separate clearly: gray wolf optimisation obtains the best aggregate rank, ant colony optimisation the largest hypervolume and the lowest scalar loss, and most methods dominate random search with large effect sizes. On the untouched holdout the separation disappears. Balanced accuracy lies between 0.66 and 0.70 for every method, run-to-run dispersion equals the between-method spread, no metaheuristic beats random search on any criterion, and stronger validation search is associated with slightly weaker generalization. A ridge-logistic model with a fixed 0.50 threshold matches or exceeds every optimized configuration, and ranking the same days by the current VIX alone reaches an area under the curve of 0.772. The framework performs better under realized-volatility, drawdown and illiquidity labels. Pareto quality and decision quality therefore have to be reported separately. A MATLAB implementation reproducing every result is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.