ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Expert consensus on sustainable employability of older workers: research, practice, and policy dimensions.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sustainable employability has been recognized as a central construct for understanding workers' continued participation in the labor market throughout the life course, particularly in the context of population aging, technological transformations, and changing work arrangements. Despite growing research in this field, conceptual fragmentation and a lack of consensus persist regarding the key factors, organizational practices, and public policies associated with the construct. Accordingly, this study aimed to identify factors, organizational practices, public policies, and research dimensions related to the sustainable employability of older workers from the perspective of international academic experts. Methods: A sequential exploratory mixed-method Delphi design was adopted. Fourteen experts from different countries participated in the first Delphi round, with 12 completing the second round and 9 completing the final round. The first qualitative stage was conducted as a structured elicitation exercise and organized participants' responses into five analytical domains: the definition of sustainable employability, organizational practices, public policies, individual factors, and research dimensions. In the subsequent rounds, the items derived from these domains were quantitatively evaluated for expert agreement. Results: High levels of consensus were observed regarding physical and mental health, lifelong learning, healthy work environments, organizational practices to combat ageism, workplace flexibility, and the integration of health, social security, and employment policies. Additional dimensions, including meaning of work, career adaptability, work-life balance, and support networks, also achieved the predefined consensus criteria in the final Delphi round. Divergence remained primarily for selected policy-related dimensions, particularly tax incentives for companies and funding for age-friendly workplace adaptations. Discussion: The findings support the conceptualization of sustainable employability as a multilevel and contextual construct encompassing individual resources, organizational practices, and institutional policies. This study contributes to the conceptual advancement of the field by providing expert-based evidence that clarifies the construct and identifies dimensions that achieved expert consensus, thereby informing future research, organizational practice, and public policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.