ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Synergistic effects of action observation and object affordance on cortical excitability during BCI-triggered motor imagery in stroke: a randomized, within-subject, 2 × 2 factorial study protocol.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) using motor imagery (MI) offer promising rehabilitation potential for upper limb function in stroke survivors. Conventional paradigms rely on abstract visual feedback, which may lack ecological validity and could limit neural recruitment. Action observation (AO) and object affordance (OA) independently modulate motor cortical excitability via the mirror neuron system and canonical neural pathways. However, their potential synergistic effects in enhancing BCI performance have not been systematically investigated. We propose a novel "Phygital" intervention integrating dynamic visual cues (AO) with static environmental cues (OA) to potentially enhance cortical excitability and support motor rehabilitation. Methods: We employed a randomized within-subject 2 × 2 factorial design to disentangle dynamic and static visuomotor components during grasping MI. Participants include subacute stroke survivors with hemiplegia and age-matched healthy controls. Four conditions will be tested: (A) Baseline (pureMI), (B) AO (video-guided imagery), (C) OA (object-focused imagery), and (D) Synergy (simultaneous AO and OA). A 32-channel electroencephalography quantified event-related desynchronization (ERD) in mu and beta bands over sensorimotor cortex. Surface electromyography monitored muscle quiescence. Significant task-related ERD triggered a soft robotic hand exoskeleton to deliver time-locked proprioceptive feedback, closing the sensorimotor loop. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that congruent simultaneous presentation of AO and OA cues will produce a significant AO × OA interaction in sensorimotor ERD. Specifically, the facilitatory effect of AO on ERD is expected to be greater when OA is present than when OA is absent. This interaction is also expected to be accompanied by improved BCI performance compared with the single-cue conditions. Significance: By anchoring MI to tangible physical targets within a digital sensorimotor loop, this protocol bridges covert motor planning and real-world interaction. Findings will elucidate visuomotor integration mechanisms and inform development of ecologically valid, high-efficacy BCI rehabilitation strategies. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=292325, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500111192, prospectively registered on October 27, 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.