ArticleFrontiers in oral health2026
Tregs and persistent
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poor oral health is commonly linked to cardiovascular disease through the established association between periodontitis and systemic inflammation. This relationship is usually explained by bacterial dissemination from periodontal pockets, lipid dysregulation, and oxidative stress, all of which may contribute to endothelial dysfunction and atherothrombotic changes. However, this conventional framework leaves an important question unresolved: if the main infectious and inflammatory niches are removed after complete tooth loss (edentulism), how does edentulism remain associated with increased cardiovascular risk? Epidemiological studies consistently show that edentulous individuals continue to have elevated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, yet mechanistic explanations for this association remain underdeveloped. Therefore, this paper proposes a plausible biological model to explain persistent cardiovascular risk in edentulism. The model argues that, after tooth loss, the oral environment is not biologically inert but rather reorganised into a distinct ecological and immunological niche shaped by dentures, altered salivary flow, nutrient changes, microtrauma, and residual soft-tissue biofilms. The tongue, oral mucosa, saliva, and denture surfaces may support persistent colonisation by
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.