Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42806958›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2025

Reflections on the Development and Implementation of a University Student Health and Well-being Online Survey: the BOOST-Well Project.

Justin Keogh, Evelyne Rathbone, Wendy J Brown, Beth Mozolic-Staunton, Gregory Cox, James Furness, Jaclyn Szkwara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Justin KeoghFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, 4227, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9851-1068
Evelyne RathboneFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, 4227, Australia.
Wendy J BrownFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, 4227, Australia.
Beth Mozolic-StauntonFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, 4227, Australia.
Gregory CoxFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, 4227, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4334-608X
James Furness *Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, 4227, Australia.
Jaclyn Szkwara *Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, 4227, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: First year university students may be at risk of poor health behaviours and outcomes. Unfortunately, online surveys assessing multiple aspects of the health and well-being of university students have poor response rates, meaning the representativeness of such data may be questionable. This study sought to develop and implement an online survey to examine the health and well-being behaviours of medical and allied health students, with higher participation and response rate than have been reported in previous surveys. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was developed following recommendations to maximise the participation and response rates. All new students (defined as commencing a degree in May or September 2024) from undergraduate medical and postgraduate allied health programs from one Australian university were requested to participate. The survey included 136 items, most of which were validated questionnaires commonly used in national surveys. Participants were requested to complete the survey on their own device during scheduled class time within the first two weeks of their degree. Results: Of 273 eligible students, 217 (79.5%) accessed the survey, with 201 (73.6%) completing it at least partially and 63.7% completing it fully. Median completion time was 14.4 (IQR: 12.3-16.8) minutes, and item-level response rates were high across disciplines. Differences in completion rates and survey duration were observed, with occupational therapy students taking the longest time to complete the survey (17.4 min). Conclusions: The BOOST-Well survey achieved markedly higher response rates than comparable studies. This may reflect the student-informed survey design, concise format, strategic timing, and evidence-based recruitment and implementation strategies.

Indexed as

StudentsAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInternetMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultAdministrationCollegeCommunity HealthExperimental Designhealth behavioursHealth Educationquestionnairesrecruitmentresponse rate

Identifiers

PMID42806958
PMCPMC13616052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.