ArticleJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B2026
Neural network approach for predicting outcomes of external cephalic version for breech presentation: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The procedure of external cephalic version (ECV) is an important option in the management of breech presentation. However, there is still a lack of effective methods to accurately predict the likelihood of ECV success on the basis of individual conditions. With the aim of better predicting the outcomes of ECV and subsequent delivery modes, this study developed neural network-based models. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with singleton pregnancies who underwent an ECV for breech presentation at a single, tertiary, university-affiliated hospital between January 2016 and September 2023. Data on the demographic characteristics, comprehensive preoperative ultrasound assessment, and conditions during the ECV procedure were extracted from the hospital's electronic record system. A neural network algorithm was implemented to establish prediction models for the success or failure of ECV, as well as subsequent delivery modes. The performance of the models was improved by increasing the number of iterations. A total of 378 patients were retrospectively included, including 279 successful and 99 failed cases, showing an overall success rate of 73.8%. Univariate analysis revealed that gravidity, parity, systolic blood pressure, presence of uterine fibroids, and amniotic fluid index (AFI) indicated by preoperative and intra-operative ultrasound were positively associated with ECV success, while thicker maternal abdominal walls and the use of anesthesia were correlated with failure. Multivariate analysis determined that parity, uterine fibroids, AFI, and the use of anesthesia were independent determinants of ECV outcomes. The samples were then divided into training and testing sets in a 1 ׃ 1 ratio. By increasing the number of iterations, the true positive rates for the successful and failed versions both reached 100%. The overall accuracy was 82.5% for predicting ECV outcomes. A total of 291 samples with delivery records were included for the prediction of delivery modes. The neural network-based model achieved a predictive accuracy of 78.8% after 2000 iterations, with the true positive rates for vaginal delivery and cesarean section both reaching 100%. These algorithms output exact predicted probabilities instead of providing the outcomes alone. An external validation set was also employed to further confirm the algorithm's performance. Collectively, prediction models formulated on the basis of neural network algorithms were developed to assess the ECV outcomes and subsequent delivery modes, with both models demonstrating favorable results and great performance. For women eligible for ECV, the application of these models can potentially assist in the crucial clinical decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.