Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42806810›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2026

Comparative Immunohistochemical Study of Canine Mammary Tumours: Introducing of Triple-Negative Profile (ER

Hossein Lak, Amir Amniattalab

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hossein LakDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ur.C., Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran.
Amir AmniattalabDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ur.C., Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0420-8621

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMammary tumours are the most common neoplasm in female dogs. Canine mammary tumours (CMTs) are appropriate models for human studies.

objectivesThe present study aimed to diagnose CMTs pathologically and compare different tumour types by immunohistochemistry (IHC).

methodsHistological features of various tumours were recorded. Moreover, haematological, biochemical and immunohistochemical changes were evaluated in affected animals.

resultsAmong 130 mastectomized dogs in veterinary hospitals in Tehran, Iran, 74 dogs were affected by various types of mammary tumours. The highest frequency of malignant tumours was related to carcinoma types (38/74; 51.4%) and the highest frequency of benign tumours was related to fibroadenoma (6/74; 8.1%). In malignant tumours, anaemia and monocytosis were observed compared to benign tumours. Serum ALT and ALP levels were also significantly increased in malignant tumours (p < 0.05) compared to benign tumours. The IHC showed the profile of adenoma (ductal and intraductal papillary) ER

conclusionTogether, although the dog is a good model for studying mammary tumours, the variability of results in CMTs requires further studies in this field. An interesting finding of this study was the triple-negative profile in the benign mixed tumour, which had previously been reported only for malignant mammary tumours. In addition, the significant positivity of Ki67 expression (34%-66%) in benign CMTs is noted for the first time.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesMammary Neoplasms, AnimalAnimalsDogsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleImmunohistochemistryIranReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesteronedogsimmunohistochemistrymammary tumourstriple‐negative profile

Identifiers

PMID42806810
PMCPMC13620831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.