Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42806670›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent mental health2026

Debate: Is ACE screening doing more harm than good? A consideration of screening versus child health surveillance.

Helen Minnis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Helen MinnisCentre for Developmental Adversity and Resilience, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2377-8945

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ACEs questionnaire has been used in population epidemiology for decades and is now recommended, by some authors, for screening purposes. However, screening programmes bring both harms and benefits and are different from population epidemiology and clinical enquiry. In this paper, I use a modern modification of Wilson and Jungner's screening programme criteria to consider whether a screening programme for ACEs would be advisable. I conclude that a screening programme for ACEs would not be appropriate and might be harmful. However, routine child health surveillance, with close collaboration across agencies including health, education and social work, is essential to ensure that ACEs, and potential harms arising from ACEs, are avoided wherever possible. A composite case example from Scotland, a country with a well-developed child health surveillance system, is provided to illustrate how such a system can support children who have experienced ACEs and their families.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesChild HealthMass ScreeningPopulation SurveillanceChildHumansScotlandSurveys and QuestionnairesACEschild health surveillancescreening

Identifiers

PMID42806670
PMCPMC13668478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.