Observational studyJournal of obesity2026
Body Shape Indices and Chronic Knee Pain in Chinese Aging Population: A Longitudinal Analysis of Abdominal Obesity, BMI, and Waist Circumference.
Observational study in Journal of obesity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Body Shape Indices and Chronic Knee Pain in Chinese Aging Population: A Longitudinal Analysis of Abdominal Obesity, BMI, and Waist Circumference.Journal of obesity · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic knee pain (CKP) is a globally prevalent condition among older adults, yet the predictive value of diverse obesity-related indices for CKP remains insufficiently explored in the Chinese population. This study aims to investigate the longitudinal relationship between abdominal obesity, multiple body shape indices (including weight, body mass index [BMI], waist circumference [WC], visceral adiposity index [VAI], and conicity index [CI]), and the risk of developing CKP using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).
methodsWe conducted a longitudinal analysis using data from CHARLS Wave 3 (2015, baseline) to Wave 5 (2020). The inclusion criteria were participants aged 55 years or older with complete biomarkers from fasting blood samples and anthropometric data at baseline. We excluded participants who: (1) had missing blood test results or body index data, (2) were lost to follow-up, (3) had missing information regarding knee pain, and (4) reported pre-existing knee pain at baseline (Wave 3). Abdominal obesity and body shape indices were assessed at baseline. The incidence of CKP was defined as reporting knee pain in two consecutive follow-up waves. Logistic regression and restricted cubic splines were employed to evaluate the associations.
results889 out of 3288 participants, which is 27.04%, were identified as CKP during the 5-year follow-up period (2015-2020). After adjusting for various confounding factors, the OR for CKP associated with BMI was 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01-1.05; p = 0.020), WC was 1.01 (95% CI: 1.01-1.02; p = 0.011), and people with abdominal obesity was 1.36 (95% CI: 1.15-1.60; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated similar results without any interactions. In restricted cubic spline regression, the relationship between BMI and CKP is nonlinear, and the relationship between WC and CKP is linear.
conclusionsAmong middle-aged and older adults, abdominal obesity, BMI, and WC should be regarded as risk factors of CKP, whereas VAI, CI, and body weight should not. Notably, this study revealed a nonlinear relationship between BMI and CKP, contrasting with the linear link observed between WC and CKP. Furthermore, compared to BMI and WC, abdominal obesity demonstrates a higher statistical effect size and more pronounced clinical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.