ArticleTranslational neurodegeneration2026
Large-scale genetic profiling of hereditary ataxias in China: implications for a stepwise molecular diagnostic strategy.
Article in Translational neurodegeneration, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHereditary ataxias are clinically and genetically heterogeneous, which complicates clinical management, genetic counseling, and scientific research. Efficient molecular diagnosis is essential but requires molecular epidemiological considerations due to the variable genetic landscapes across regions and populations. In China, despite the established predominance of spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3), comprehensive data on the genetic landscape of hereditary ataxias are limited and increasingly outdated, leaving insufficient evidence to support an epidemiology-informed molecular diagnostic strategy and its clinical implementation as a diagnostic algorithm.
methodsWe retrospectively established a large, real-world, comprehensive cohort of hereditary ataxias (the HARMONY cohort) recruited from two medical centers in the Yangtze River Delta region of China (2008-2024) for genetic profiling. Molecular diagnoses were categorized into four classifications ('Definitive', 'Probable', 'Unclear', 'Undiagnosed') by integrating previously identified causative variants with results from systematic genetic testing in etiologically undetermined probands, and the associated variants were mapped onto genetic landscapes.
resultsA total of 2096 probands were included in the HARMONY cohort, achieving a molecular diagnostic yield of 84.9%, with 1715 (81.8%) 'Definitive' and 65 (3.1%) 'Probable' positive diagnoses, alongside 87 (4.2%) 'Unclear' and 229 (10.9%) 'Undiagnosed' cases. While the genetic landscape was dominated by variants underlying SCA3 (1249; 59.6%), with SCA2 (150; 7.2%), SCA1 (139; 6.6%), SCA6 (51; 2.4%), putative SCA36 (36; 1.7%), and SCA12 (35; 1.7%) constituting the major subtypes, the genetic profiling revealed a long tail of rare genotypes. Onset age distributions were characterized for genotypes with ≥ 5 probands. No probands were found to carry expansions in ZFHX3, BEAN1, DAB1, THAP11, or FXN.
conclusionsGenetic profiling of the HARMONY cohort revealed a skewed genetic landscape dominated by a few common repeat-expansion subtypes, alongside a markedly heterogeneous long tail of rare etiologies. The holistic profile supports a stepwise molecular diagnostic strategy, under which we propose a YRD (Yangtze River Delta)-oriented candidate diagnostic algorithm. This study provides an evidence base for early molecular diagnosis, prioritization of therapeutic development, and adaptive design of diagnostic tools for hereditary ataxias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.