Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42806391›Full record

ArticleInfectious agents and cancer2026

Sampling constraints, sparse-cell estimates, and cross-sectional inference: considerations on hr-HPV prevalence and associated factors among HIV-positive women in Mekelle, Ethiopia.

Shweta Thusoo

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious agents and cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shweta ThusooDr. D. Y. School of Allied Health Sciences, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pimpri, Pune, India. shweta.thusoo@dpu.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0316-3193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shfare et al. report a high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) prevalence of 39.7% among HIV-positive women attending public health facilities in Mekelle, Ethiopia, and identify several clinical and behavioural predictors using multivariable logistic regression. The study addresses an important evidence gap in a high-burden setting and employs rigorous molecular detection methods. Nevertheless, three methodological considerations affect the interpretation of the findings. First, facility-based recruitment from selected antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinics may limit the generalizability of the reported prevalence estimate and observed associations to the broader population of women living with HIV. Second, several adjusted odds ratios are accompanied by wide confidence intervals, indicating limited precision and warranting cautious interpretation. Finally, the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference regarding the association between oral contraceptive use and hr-HPV infection because residual confounding and reverse causation cannot be excluded. Collectively, these issues suggest that the findings should be interpreted cautiously and highlight the need for prospective population-based studies to validate the reported risk factors before they inform screening or prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerCross-sectional studyEthiopiaHIVhr-HPVLogistic regressionSelection bias

Identifiers

PMID42806391
PMCPMC13617853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.