ArticleJournal of neuroinflammation2026
The influence of anti-CD20-directed B cell depletion across different agents on Epstein-Barr virus-specific humoral and cellular immunity in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Article in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpidemiological evidence has established a central role of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). While EBV-specific T-cell responses may influence disease progression, the impact of anti-CD20 B-cell depletion therapy (BCDT) on EBV-specific cellular and humoral immunity remains insufficiently characterized, particularly in comparison with healthy controls (HC), untreated people with MS (pwMS), and pwMS on different BCDT agents. MAIN BODY: Methods In this cross-sectional study, pwMS receiving BCDT, untreated pwMS at initial diagnosis (MS-ID), and age- and sex-matched HC were enrolled. EBV-specific and polyclonal CD8
resultsA total of 183 participants were included: 54 pwMS receiving BCDT (mean age 47.0±15.6 years; 31 females), 107 controls (47.2±18.3 years, 54 females), and 22 MS-ID (33.4±11.1 years, 20 females). EBV-specific CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T-cell levels were similar in controls and MS-ID. In contrast, BCD-treated pwMS showed significantly lower frequencies of EBV-specific CD8⁺ (p<0.0001) and CD4⁺ T cells (p=0.0004) than controls, and lower EBV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell levels than MS-ID (p=0.0023). In contrast, polyclonally stimulated CD8⁺ T-cell responses were largely comparable across groups, indicating preserved polyclonal T-cell function. EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in both patients and controls were predominantly polyfunctional, coexpressing IFNγ, IL-2, and TNF. Longer BCDT duration was associated with lower frequencies of EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cells (p=0.0003). Ofatumumab-treated patients exhibited higher EBV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell frequencies than ocrelizumab-treated patients (p<0.0001). Despite BCDT, anti-EBNA1- and anti-VCA-IgG levels were significantly higher in pwMS than in MS-ID or controls, and were unrelated to treatment duration, disease duration, disability, or BCDT agents.
conclusionsUnlike in treatment-naïve pwMS, BCDT is associated with selectively lower EBV-specific T-cell frequencies while EBV-specific and polyclonal T-cell functionality was largely preserved. In contrast, EBV-specific antibody levels were persistently higher despite treatment. Given the remarkably high clinical efficacy of BCDT in this cohort, the findings support a prominent role of EBV-specific cellular immunity in ongoing MS pathophysiology and suggest that reduced EBV-reactive T-cell responses may contribute to this potency. Differences between BCDT agents warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.