Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42806309›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2026

Ultrasound radiomics-based machine learning models for differentiating diabetic kidney disease from non-diabetic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes.

Wenye Chen, Dan Zhao, Lehao Wu, Wenkun Bai, Xintong Wang, Ying Ying Zhang, Jian-Ying Niu, Chen Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wenye ChenDepartment of Nephrology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Dan ZhaoDepartment of Nephrology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lehao WuDepartment of Nephrology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wenkun BaiDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xintong WangDepartment of Nephrology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ying Ying ZhangDepartment of Nephrology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jian-Ying NiuDepartment of Nephrology, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chen YuDepartment of Nephrology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. yuchen@tongji.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82170696Shanghai Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 23Y11908900Shanghai ShenKang Hospital Development Center Project SHDC12022104the Project of Tongji Hospital of Tongji University No. ITJ(QN)2104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveNoninvasive differentiation of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) from non-diabetic kidney disease (NDKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains challenging, as conventional clinical markers and ultrasound imaging lack sufficient accuracy and reliability. This limitation often leads to unnecessary renal biopsies or delayed diagnosis. To address this gap, this study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model integrating renal ultrasound radiomic features and clinical predictors to distinguish DKD from NDKD in T2DM patients.

methodsPatients with T2DM who underwent renal biopsy were retrospectively enrolled from three centers. Based on biopsy findings, patients were classified as DKD or NDKD, with overlapping lesions assigned to DKD. Renal ultrasound images were collected for ROI delineation and radiomic feature extraction. Clinical predictors were selected using logistic regression, correlation analysis, and LASSO. SVM, KNN, RF, and XGBoost models were developed using radiomic features alone or combined with clinical variables. Performance was evaluated by AUC, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, and SHAP was used for model interpretation.

resultsUnivariate analysis identified serum creatinine, eGFR, albumin and LDL‑C as significant variables, and eGFR was selected as the final clinical predictor after LASSO and multivariable logistic regression. The radiomics‑only model performed well in the training cohort but showed lower performance in the validation cohorts. The integrated model combining radiomic features with eGFR achieved AUCs of 0.991, 0.895 and 0.721 in the training, internal validation and external validation cohorts, respectively, with corresponding F1‑scores of 0.939, 0.815 and 0.714. DeLong's test further showed that XGBoost performed better than several comparator algorithms in the training and internal validation cohorts, whereas no significant differences were observed among models in the external validation cohort.

conclusionThe XGBoost model integrating renal ultrasound radiomic features with eGFR showed favourable performance for differentiating DKD from NDKD in patients with T2DM. By using routinely available ultrasound images and a readily accessible clinical indicator, this model may serve as a non-invasive auxiliary tool for preliminary screening in primary-level hospitals or nephrology departments, providing supportive evidence for individualized assessment and renal biopsy decision-making.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesKidney DiseasesMachine LearningAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsRadiomicsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyDiabetic kidney diseaseMachine learningRadiomicsType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)Ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42806309
PMCPMC13617703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.