Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42806297›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026

CADD-ThresholdApp: an interactive web application for calibrating CADD scores using ClinVar.

Cora Leifheit, Martin Kircher, Max Schubach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cora LeifheitBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstraße 65, 10117, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7189-4338
Martin KircherBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstraße 65, 10117, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-5471
Max SchubachBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstraße 65, 10117, Berlin, Germany. max.schubach@bih-charite.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2032-6679

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) score is one of the most widely used genome-wide variant deleteriousness scores. In practice, however, the distribution of CADD scores differs across genes and gene sets and may also vary between genome builds and CADD releases, complicating the choice of a single threshold for prioritizing potentially pathogenic variants in routine diagnostics.

resultsWe present CADD-ThresholdApp, an interactive web application that supports threshold selection by visualizing CADD-score distributions of clinically classified variants from ClinVar and by reporting threshold-dependent performance metrics. The app enables comparisons across genome releases (GRCh37/GRCh38) and CADD versions (v1.6/v1.7), supports user-defined genes and gene lists, as well as curated gene panels from PanelApp. CADD-ThresholdApp is implemented in a modular, extensible framework and can be adapted to additional variant resources and deleteriousness scores. The app is available as a hosted web application at https://cadd-threshold.kircherlab.bihealth.org/ and can be installed locally via container, PyPI, Bioconda, or from source.

conclusionsOverall, CADD-ThresholdApp provides a practical and transparent framework for context-specific threshold calibration to support more informed variant interpretation in research and diagnostics.

Indexed as

SoftwareCalibrationGenetic VariationGenomicsHumansInternetMolecular Sequence AnnotationCADD scoreClinVarGene panelsRare diseasesVariant prioritizationVisualizationWeb application

Identifiers

PMID42806297
PMCPMC13617862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.