ArticleNeurocritical care2026
Binary Classification of Consciousness Using Cerebral Blood Flow and EEG Features.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesAssessing consciousness at the bedside in the neurocritical care unit is complicated by sedation and other treatment effects. While electroencephalogram (EEG) is commonly used, it offers a limited view of the neurovascular unit. We evaluated whether combining cerebral blood flow (CBF) features with EEG improves binary classification of consciousness in patients with severe brain injury.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 26 adults who underwent multimodal neuromonitoring. Signals were segmented into 30-min windows after each probe recalibration. We used parameters including CBF low-frequency bands (band IV 0.027-0.073 Hz, band V 0.01-0.027 Hz, and band all 0-0.5 Hz) and EEG band powers (delta-beta), alpha-delta ratio (ADR), alpha/(delta + theta) (ADTR), total power. A random forest (RF) model trained using K-fold cross-validation achieved optimal classification. Highly correlated features (r > 0.8) were excluded from simultaneous use. Performance was summarized with receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) and accuracy, with confusion matrices shown for the best combinations.
resultsMultimodal feature combinations significantly improved classification compared with EEG features alone. The best-performing combination (EEG ADR, total EEG power, and CBF B and V) achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.86 and an accuracy of 82%, outperforming EEG-only models. In two exploratory cases with noninvasive diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) monitoring, the same feature framework produced predictions concordant with those obtained using invasive CBF features.
conclusionsCombining EEG and CBF metrics, particularly low-frequency oscillations in perfusion fluctuations, enhances classification of consciousness in critically ill patients and may support future bedside tools for real-time neurovascular monitoring and decision making about treatment and rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42806264What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.