ArticleNeurocritical care2026
Automated Derivation of Cerebral Performance Category at Hospital Discharge After Cardiac Arrest Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical notes in the electronic health record (EHR) contain rich information that may be leveraged for automated prognostication using natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning. We evaluated the performance and potential biases of an NLP-based machine learning model for deriving cerebral performance category (CPC) for comatose patients following cardiac arrest using EHR clinical notes.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who were comatose after in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest across three academic hospitals in the USA. Neurological outcomes were assessed at hospital discharge, with CPC scores of 1-3 indicating good outcomes and 4-5 indicating poor outcomes. An NLP-based logistic regression model was trained on 249 patients using all clinical notes throughout hospitalization. Model performance was evaluated on a holdout set of 108 patients. Performance was also evaluated on the holdout set using only notes documented within the first 24 h of hospitalization.
resultsUsing all clinical notes, the model achieved an overall accuracy of 81%, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.90 and an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.89. When restricted to notes documented within the first 24 h of hospitalization, model accuracy decreased to 74%, with AUROC of 0.83 and AUPRC of 0.83. The model demonstrated higher precision in predicting poor neurological outcomes, particularly among patients who underwent withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.
conclusionsAn NLP-based machine learning model demonstrated high accuracy in deriving CPC for comatose patients after cardiac arrest using EHR clinical notes. Clinical documentation within 24 h after cardiac arrest contained substantial prognostic signals about neurological outcomes, reflecting a combination of patient biology, clinician assessment, and potentially early prognostic framing. Future research should incorporate multimodal data and employ interpretable advanced language models to increase accuracy toward fully automatable CPC derivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42806261What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.