ReviewOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026
Current Trends in AI and Eye Disease Diagnostics.
Review in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeArtificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly advanced as an approach for ophthalmic disease detection, driven by the widespread use of high-dimensional imaging modalities (e.g., optical coherence tomography). This review summarises the machine learning and AI approaches for disease detection in ophthalmology and discusses emerging paradigms and highlights key challenges impacting clinical translation. RECENT
findingsAI-based systems have demonstrated suitably high diagnostic performance across major ophthalmic diseases, including diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic macular oedema, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration and retinopathy of prematurity. Several tools have even received regulatory approval for commercial DR screening. More recently, foundation models trained using self-supervised learning have enabled more generalisable and data-efficient disease detection across datasets and imaging modalities. In parallel, multimodal large language model systems are emerging that integrate imaging and clinical data to support more comprehensive diagnostic workflows. Early agentic AI systems extend this paradigm further by coordinating multiple models to perform disease detection, provide clinical decision support and generate reports. AI-based disease detection in ophthalmology has achieved substantial technical progress but only limited translation into routine clinical practice. Key barriers include technical, clinical, ethical, economic and regulatory concerns. Future efforts should prioritise prospective evaluation in real-world settings, addressing model transparency and bias and alignment with clinical and regulatory requirements. With continued advances, AI has the potential to expand access to care, improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce the global burden of vision loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42806246What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.