Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42806246›Full record

ReviewOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026

Current Trends in AI and Eye Disease Diagnostics.

Maria Jessica Cruz, Siddharth Limaye, Mark Christopher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Jessica Cruz *University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.
Siddharth Limaye *Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Mark ChristopherViterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. mac157@health.ucsd.edu.

Funding

Bridge2AI:Salutogenesis Data Generation ProjectOT2OD032644 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAXTER, SALLY LIU, CHUTE, CHRISTOPHER G · 2022 to 2025
$32.7M
NIH HHS OT2OD032644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeArtificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly advanced as an approach for ophthalmic disease detection, driven by the widespread use of high-dimensional imaging modalities (e.g., optical coherence tomography). This review summarises the machine learning and AI approaches for disease detection in ophthalmology and discusses emerging paradigms and highlights key challenges impacting clinical translation. RECENT

findingsAI-based systems have demonstrated suitably high diagnostic performance across major ophthalmic diseases, including diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic macular oedema, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration and retinopathy of prematurity. Several tools have even received regulatory approval for commercial DR screening. More recently, foundation models trained using self-supervised learning have enabled more generalisable and data-efficient disease detection across datasets and imaging modalities. In parallel, multimodal large language model systems are emerging that integrate imaging and clinical data to support more comprehensive diagnostic workflows. Early agentic AI systems extend this paradigm further by coordinating multiple models to perform disease detection, provide clinical decision support and generate reports. AI-based disease detection in ophthalmology has achieved substantial technical progress but only limited translation into routine clinical practice. Key barriers include technical, clinical, ethical, economic and regulatory concerns. Future efforts should prioritise prospective evaluation in real-world settings, addressing model transparency and bias and alignment with clinical and regulatory requirements. With continued advances, AI has the potential to expand access to care, improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce the global burden of vision loss.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningDigital innovationsMachine learningOphthalmology diagnostics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.