ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Invariant Texture Features to Gray Level Discretization.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Texture features are widely used in medical image analysis as quantitative descriptors of spatial intensity patterns. However, many texture features are strongly dependent on gray-level discretization, which limits their reproducibility and robustness across datasets. In this study, we propose a normalization framework to reduce gray-level dependence and construct discretization invariant texture features. Original and normalized invariant features were extracted from four medical datasets and their stability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. Downstream predictive performance was evaluated using AdaBoost models for binary classification tasks. Feature stability was further assessed under different sample size and class distribution to assess robustness to sampling variation. Statistical analyses were performed to compare feature-wise ICC values and stability distributions across experimental settings. Invariant normalization significantly increased ICC values and yielded more consistent feature stability across different sampling conditions. Overall, the proposed framework substantially improves feature stability and reproducibility while enhancing downstream predictive performance, thereby reducing the dependence of texture features on gray-level discretization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42806196What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.