Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42806187›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2026

Double-antigen sandwich ELISA based on chimeric antigens for detection of antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi in human sera - A phase II study.

Natália Erdens Maron Freitas, Felipe Silva Santos Jesus, Randrin Queiroz Viana Ferreira, Edimilson Domingos Silva, Keila Gisele Azevedo Figueiredo Santos, Maria Amélia Virgens Lima, Cristiane Oliveira Mota, Ângelo Antônio Oliveira Silva, Paola Alejandra Fiorani Celedon, Nilson Ivo Tonin Zanchin and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Natália Erdens Maron FreitasAdvanced Public Health Laboratory (LASP), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ-BA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Felipe Silva Santos JesusAdvanced Public Health Laboratory (LASP), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ-BA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Randrin Queiroz Viana FerreiraAdvanced Public Health Laboratory (LASP), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ-BA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Edimilson Domingos SilvaImmunobiological Technology Institute (Bio-Manguinhos), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ-RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Keila Gisele Azevedo Figueiredo SantosImmunobiological Technology Institute (Bio-Manguinhos), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ-RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maria Amélia Virgens LimaImmunobiological Technology Institute (Bio-Manguinhos), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ-RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cristiane Oliveira MotaCentral Public Health Laboratory of Bahia (LACEN-BA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Ângelo Antônio Oliveira SilvaAdvanced Public Health Laboratory (LASP), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ-BA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Paola Alejandra Fiorani CeledonInterdisciplinary Research Group in Biotechnology and Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases (GRUPIBE), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ-BA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Nilson Ivo Tonin ZanchinInterdisciplinary Research Group in Biotechnology and Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases (GRUPIBE), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ-BA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Fred Luciano Neves SantosAdvanced Public Health Laboratory (LASP), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ-BA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. fred.santos@fiocruz.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-0818

Funding

Bahia State Research Support Foundation (FAPESB/SECTI) Universal proposal Nº APP0007/2023Improvement of Higher Education Personnel in Brazil (CAPES) Finance Code 001INOVA Fiocruz Pesquisa Clínica em Doença de Chagas VPPCB-001-FIO-22-2-11National Council for Scientific and Technological Development-Brazil (CNPq) 304894/2023-0National Council for Scientific and Technological Development-Brazil (CNPq) 442269/2024-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLaboratory confirmation of chronic Chagas disease (CD) relies on serology, yet conventional indirect ELISAs depend on species- and class-specific secondary antibodies and remain prone to cross-reactivity. The chimeric antigens IBMP-8.1, IBMP-8.2, IBMP-8.3, and IBMP-8.4 perform well in indirect formats, and a proof-of-concept phase I double-antigen sandwich ELISA (DAgS-ELISA) achieved high specificity but limited sensitivity. We re-optimized and validated the IBMP-DAgS-ELISA in a phase II study.

methodsThe four antigens were conjugated to horseradish peroxidase and re-optimized by checkerboard titration. Diagnostic performance was assessed against a latent class analysis reference standard using 403 T. cruzi-positive and 399 T. cruzi-negative sera from the Central Public Health Laboratory of Bahia, applying a single pre-specified reactivity-index cut-off (RI ≥ 1.0). Cross-reactivity was evaluated in 206 sera from individuals with other infectious diseases, and intra-plate repeatability in 28 positive and 28 negative sera tested in triplicate.

resultsIBMP-8.4 showed the highest values for most performance measures (area under the curve 99.8%, sensitivity 99.8%, specificity 98.0%, accuracy 98.9%, diagnostic odds ratio 19,648, Cohen's κ 0.98), and IBMP-8.3 the highest specificity (99.0%). The parallel combination IBMP-8.3/IBMP-8.4 reached 100% sensitivity and 97.0% specificity. Cross-reactivity was low overall and absent for IBMP-8.4 (0/206), including against Leishmania and Schistosoma spp. Across triplicate testing, sensitivity (92.9-100%) and area under the curve (94.3-100%) were stable for all antigens, whereas specificity varied more widely (78.6-100%) in the repeatability subset.

conclusionThe re-optimized IBMP-DAgS-ELISA matches the indirect-ELISA benchmark of the same antigens while detecting total antibodies independently of immunoglobulin class or host species. IBMP-8.4, alone or combined with IBMP-8.3, is an accurate option for chronic CD serology and reinstates a double-antigen sandwich platform on a fully defined chimeric-antigen basis.

Indexed as

Chagas diseaseChimeric recombinant antigensDouble-antigen sandwich ELISALatent class analysisSerodiagnosisTrypanosoma cruzi

Identifiers

PMID42806187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.