ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
Randomized pilot study comparing standard vs high-calorie feeding in infants with Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04419857 (A Randomized Control Trial to Determine Weight Gain Benefits of Caloric Supplementation for NAS Infants), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Control Trial to Determine Weight Gain Benefits of Caloric Supplementation for NAS Infants
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe assessed feasibility of high-calorie feeds in infants with NOWS at risk for excessive weight loss managed using Eat, Sleep, Console. STUDY
designIn this double-blind pilot study (NCT04419857, Connecticut, USA), we randomized methadone- or buprenorphine-prenatally-exposed infants <48 h old to standard- or high-calorie feeds. Primary outcomes were enrollment, adherence, and retention; exploratory outcomes included breastfeeding and stooling frequency.
resultsFrom December 2020 to August 2023, 35/65 infants (53.8%) were randomized. During hospitalization, 84% of feeds adhered to the randomized feeding approach. In-hospital retention was 71.4%; 14-day post-discharge retention was 28.6%. Groups did not differ significantly in demographic characteristics, maximum percent weight loss (p = 0.12), length of stay (p = 0.88), or stool frequency (p = 0.59). High-calorie-fed infants more frequently received breastmilk at discharge (p = 0.04).
conclusionEnrollment, adherence, and in-hospital retention were comparable to other feasibility trials; post-discharge follow-up was poor. Early high-calorie feeding did not appear to be negatively associated with breastfeeding or stooling.
Identifiers
42806043What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.