ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Reanalysis of genomic data doubles the diagnostic yield for Welsh patients recruited to the UK 100,000 Genomes Project.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 100,000 Genomes Project (100KGP) undertook genome sequencing of patients with rare diseases and cancer to study the role that genes play in disease, and to integrate genomics into UK healthcare. To contribute to 100KGP, the Wales Genomic Medicine Centre (a partnership between the NHS All Wales Medical Genomics Service (AWMGS), Cardiff University and Genomics England) recruited 438 individuals from 154 families that had been subject to pre-genomic genetic testing without reaching a diagnosis. The majority of probands (64%, 98/154) had neurological or neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Genome sequencing, variant calling, gene-based filtering and variant prioritisation were performed by Genomics England. AWMGS undertook clinical interpretation, validation and reporting of variants. Initial diagnostic yield was 20.8% (32/154) with variants of uncertain significance (VUS) reported for 11 more families. Most of the initial findings (83.7%, 36/43) could have been detected by clinical exome sequencing which was standard of care in Wales at the time. Reanalysis of the 100KGP Wales data using updated variant prioritisation tools, expanded gene lists, re-phenotyping and segregation studies, has increased diagnostic yield to 42.2% (65/154) (an improvement of 103%). RNA analysis was used to clarify the clinical significance of VUS in COQ4, ENPP1, GATAD2B, NCAPD2, and THOC2. These findings demonstrate the clinical utility of genome sequencing, RNA analysis, and periodic reanalysis of genomic data.
Identifiers
42806038What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.