Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42806015›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Reply to: Should we return to probability distributions to represent interfacial reactivity?

Anastasia G Ilgen, Eric Borguet, Franz M Geiger, Julianne M Gibbs, Vicki H Grassian, Young-Shin Jun, Nadine Kabengi, James D Kubicki

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anastasia G IlgenGeothermal Research Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA. agilgen@sandia.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7876-9387
Eric BorguetDepartment of Chemistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0593-952X
Franz M GeigerDepartment of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8569-4045
Julianne M GibbsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5819-2306
Vicki H GrassianDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5052-0045
Young-Shin JunDepartment of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Nadine KabengiDepartment of Geosciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1901-0992
James D KubickiDepartment of Earth, Environmental & Resource Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9277-9044

Funding

DOE | SC | Basic Energy Sciences (BES) 23-015452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID42806015
PMCPMC13620154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.