Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42806006›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

dioscRi enables transferable prediction of clinical outcomes in multi-parameter cytometry data.

Elijah Willie, Shreya Rao, Gemma Figtree, Jean Yang, Barbara Fazekas de St Groth, Helen McGuire, Ellis Patrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elijah WillieSydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Shreya RaoSydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Gemma FigtreeCharles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5080-6083
Jean YangSydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5271-2603
Barbara Fazekas de St GrothCharles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6817-9690
Helen McGuireCharles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2047-6543
Ellis PatrickSydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. ellis.patrick@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5253-4747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-parameter cytometry technologies enable high-dimensional analysis of immune cell populations at single-cell resolution. Deep learning has been widely applied to these datasets, but existing methods often struggle with transferability across datasets due to technical variability, batch effects and identification of biologically relevant cell populations, limiting their utility in clinical research. We present dioscRi, a transferable deep learning framework that integrates a maximum mean discrepancy variational autoencoder for normalization and de-noising, enhancing cross-dataset compatibility. Changes in cell type proportions and marker expression are identified by structuring these features within biologically or empirically derived cell type hierarchies. These hierarchies are incorporated directly into an overlapping group LASSO model, improving the prediction of clinical outcomes. When applied to a coronary artery disease study, dioscRi recapitulated several known immune associations. Benchmarking across multiple datasets demonstrated dioscRi's ability to transfer across cohorts with compatible marker panels and outperform existing methods on three of four datasets, establishing it as an interpretable tool for cytometry data analysis.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFlow CytometryAutoencoderBiomarkersHumansSingle-Cell AnalysisBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID42806006
PMCPMC13620111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.