ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2026
Healthcare professionals' perceptions and needs for a Home-based Artificial Intelligence Pain Management System for cancer pain: A qualitative study.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to explore healthcare professionals' (HCPs') perceptions of and needs for a Home-based Artificial Intelligence Pain Management System (HAIPMS) for cancer pain in Hong Kong, China.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 14 HCPs from Jockey Club Home for Hospice (JCHH) in Hong Kong, China between March and June 2025. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsTheir professional experience ranged from 3 to 33 years. Thematic analysis generated three themes and ten subthemes. The themes were: 1) valued but under-supported home-based cancer pain management, including family-dependent and intermittent professional support; comfort, affordability, and system relief in home-based care; and subjective assessment, medication non-adherence, and delayed support; 2) cautious optimism toward AI integration, including expectations for visible, measurable, and continuous pain monitoring; concern of risks resulted from AI implementation; and heterogeneous attitudes shaped by professional and generational divides; and 3) practical requirements for HAIPMS implementation, including essential functional modules; user-centered design and adaptability; safety and ethical assurance requirements; and training and sustained support.
conclusionsHCPs viewed HAIPMS as a potentially useful supportive tool for home-based cancer pain management, provided that it preserves professional autonomy, fits local care contexts, and incorporates ethical safeguards, user-friendly design, and sustained support. These findings offer practical guidance for developing AI-assisted pain management systems in home-based cancer pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.