ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2026
Sequential mediation of social resources, affiliate stigma, loneliness, and positive aspects of caregiving among Chinese and Korean American dementia caregivers.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to examine whether Asian American dementia caregivers' affiliate stigma and loneliness sequentially account for the associations of social network and social support with positive aspects of caregiving (PAC).
methodsThe sample included 162 Korean and 176 Chinese American caregivers enrolled in a randomized clinical trial and recruited from New York, US (February 2023 to September 2025). We measured social network using the Lubben Social Network Scale-6, social support using the NIH Toolbox Social Support scales, affiliate stigma using the modified Affiliate Stigma Scale, loneliness using the University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale (UCLA), and PAC using the 9-item PAC scale. We tested sequential mediation models while adjusting for sociodemographics, health status, and caregiving context. We tested indirect effects and the proportion mediated using bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs; 5,000 resamples).
resultsBoth social network (β = 0.137, 95 % CI: 0.018 to 0.254) and support (β = 0.265, 95 %CI: 0.166 to 0.360) were significantly associated with higher PAC. Total indirect effects through affiliate stigma and loneliness accounted for 38.2 % and 27.8 % of the total effects, respectively. Loneliness was the only single mediator that reached significance (social network β = 0.036, 95 %CI: 0.012 to 0.076; social support β = 0.048, 95 %CI: 0.011 to 0.098). The sequential pathway, lower stigma followed by lower loneliness, was significant for social support (β = 0.012, 95 %CI: 0.003 to 0.029) but not for social network (β = 0.008, 95 % CI: -0.000 to 0.024).
conclusionsIn this study, social resources were associated with more positive caregiving appraisals, and loneliness was the principal intervening variable. Because all measures were obtained at a single time point, these indirect effects are correlational and cannot establish causal ordering. Culturally tailored interventions should strengthen social ties and incorporate loneliness-targeted strategies, with anti-stigma components requiring further evaluation in adequately powered studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.