ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2026
The Personhood Pentadigm: A transcultural framework for analyzing existential distress in palliative care.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to address three systemic barriers in conventional palliative psychotherapy-the "somatic-reflective disconnect," compressed terminal timelines, and Western individualistic biases-by developing an integrative, transcultural, and secular care-planning framework to map and systematically disrupt end-of-life existential suffering.
methodsWe employed a dual-stage qualitative design. First, we developed the Personhood Pentadigm (PP) by translating the Eastern psychology of the Five Aggregates into five secular dimensions: Physical Image, Somatosensory Tone, Role and Narrative, Volitional Behavior, and Consciousness. We then integrated these dimensions with Western clinical humanities. Second, we operationalized the PP using purposive qualitative case vignettes of contrasting terminal trajectories, analyzed through a three-phase interpretive procedure: 1) domain-specific coding, 2) causal pathway mapping, and 3) interdisciplinary alignment.
resultsThe analysis revealed existential distress as a dynamic, multi-nodal collapse of personhood rather than a static symptom. The vignettes demonstrated two distinct configurations of suffering: 1) a sequential linear cascade (Case A) in which physical and somatosensory fractures systematically dismantle global macro-narratives, and 2) a non-linear recursive loop (Case B) where somatic distress and loss of roles feed back to drive death anxiety and fear of sleep. Operationally, establishing a somatic runway via physical stabilization is a strict prerequisite for reflective therapies. Furthermore, the PP successfully aligns clinical actions across multidisciplinary specialties.
conclusionsBy providing a shared, translational lexicon and clear role demarcation, the PP empowers multidisciplinary teams to disrupt cascading distress loops. It serves as an operational roadmap that democratizes existential care, enabling psychospiritual support to be directly integrated into bedside palliative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.