ArticleBMJ open2026
"We were caught sleeping": formulation of national policy to decentralise management of drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa - a qualitative policy analysis study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn response to growing numbers of people with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB), South Africa was, in 2011, among the first countries to launch a national policy on the decentralisation of DR-TB management, preceding normative guidance from the World Health Organization. The objective was to understand the process of formulation of the South African policy on DR-TB service decentralisation.
designQualitative policy analysis. We reviewed policy-related documents to create a timeline, then conducted in-depth interviews with key individuals who had influence over or insights into the policy formulation process. We used Kingdon's policy analysis framework to examine the convergence of problem, policy and politics streams in agenda-setting to create the window of opportunity for policy adoption.
settingSouth Africa.
participantsPolicy makers, implementers and researchers in three South African provinces and at national level, and international DR-TB experts.
resultsInternational publicity concerning the extensively drug-resistant TB outbreak in Tugela Ferry positioned DR-TB as a public health crisis. The health system lacked capacity to match hospital bed supply in specialised hospitals to the high number of people with DR-TB. Reports of detention against will, victimisation and stigmatisation, and failure to uphold person-centred approaches, sparked a human rights outcry. Tensions between actors favouring 'control-based' approaches with emphasis on centralisation and control of patient treatment and resources, and those favouring 'access-based' approaches that emphasised decentralised care led to a tipping point in the policy process. Centralised, specialised DR-TB approaches were perceived to protect quality of care, but these compromised person-centred care and human rights, and restricted access to DR-TB treatment. Policy actors used lessons from pilot studies of DR-TB decentralisation and HIV programmes to overcome policy stagnation.
conclusionsPolicy makers should monitor demand and supply of specialised services and support evidence-informed policy change before health system pressures make reform unavoidable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.