Trial reportBMJ open2026
Multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol in China comparing postless hip arthroscopy with conventional perineal post-assisted hip arthroscopy to reduce perineal complications in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: the POSTLESS-HIP trial.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07322705 (Can Perineal Post-Free Traction in Hip Arthroscopy Effectively Reduce Perineal Complications? A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Can Perineal Post-Free Traction in Hip Arthroscopy Effectively Reduce Perineal Complications? A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPerineal complications-including nerve injury (eg, pudendal neurapraxia), soft tissue injury and sexual or urinary dysfunction-are well-documented adverse effects of conventional hip arthroscopy using a perineal post. Postless hip arthroscopy avoids direct perineal pressure, but high-quality randomised evidence is lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, prospective, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial will enrol 270 patients aged 15-60 years with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome requiring hip arthroscopy. Participants will be randomised 1:1 via a centralised system using stratified block randomisation by centre to postless hip arthroscopy or conventional perineal post-assisted traction. Sample size is calculated based on an assumed incidence of the primary composite endpoint (comprising perineal numbness, perineal pain, perineal soft tissue injury, sexual dysfunction and urinary dysfunction) of 10% vs 0.5%, yielding 114 per group (90% power, α=0.05); 135 per group accounts for 15% dropout. Surgeons cannot be blinded, but participants and outcome assessors are blinded. The primary outcome is the incidence of perineal nerve injury (perineal numbness, pain, soft tissue injury and sexual/urinary dysfunction) on postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of perineal nerve injury at postoperative day 7 (discharge), non-perineal complications on postoperative day 1, preoperative preparation time, intraoperative traction time, total operative time, length of hospital stay censored at 6 weeks, patient-reported joint function outcomes assessed at 3 months using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score and the International Hip Outcome Tool 12-item questionnaire, as well as a short-term economic evaluation consisting of 14-day postoperative VAS pain intensity, 14-day mHHS hip function and total direct healthcare costs within 14 days after surgery. Analyses will follow intention-to-treat principles. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital Ethics Review Board (No. 2024KY0158-KS001). Written informed consent will be obtained. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07322705.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.