Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42804524›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2026

Spotted fever group Rickettsia infection kinetics and cutaneous host response during single tick feeding events.

Chanakan Suwanbongkot, Ingeborg M Langohr, Killian Z Brewer, Robert A Barrington, Kevin R Macaluso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chanakan SuwanbongkotDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Frederick P. Whiddon College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, United States of America.
Ingeborg M LangohrGlobal Discovery Pathology & Multimodal Imaging, Translation Models Research Platform, Sanofi, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Killian Z BrewerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Frederick P. Whiddon College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, United States of America.
Robert A BarringtonDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Frederick P. Whiddon College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, United States of America.
Kevin R MacalusoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Frederick P. Whiddon College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8537-6100

Funding

Rickettsial Influence on Host Membrane Physiology in Arthropod VectorsR01AI153155 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SWALE, DANIEL · 2021 to 2024
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI153155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rickettsia parkeri, an emerging tick-borne pathogen, is transmitted by Amblyomma maculatum. Initial bacterial inoculation occurs in the skin via infected tick bite. During blood acquisition, tick salivary factors manipulate host hemostatic and immune responses. Examination of rickettsial pathogenesis and the host response to infection in murine models primarily utilize needle inoculation. As a result, biological variables including transmission dynamics and the influence of vector saliva on the host response at the infection site are undefined. To test the hypothesis that a distinct host cutaneous immune response will be elicited based on the infection status of the tick, a single tick feeding model was developed to assess the transmission and dissemination kinetics of R. parkeri from the early stage of tick attachment (1 hour) to late feeding stage (144 hours). Furthermore, changes in the cutaneous immune response were characterized through immunophenotyping, cytokine and chemokine profiling, and histopathological analysis. The data show that transmission of R. parkeri from the infected tick to the host occurs within 1 hour-post tick attachment (hpa), with rapid dissemination to lymph nodes and internal tissues. The quantifiable bacterial load in the mouse skin delivered by an infected tick was 9,500 bacteria at 3 hours, increasing to 15,000 and 22,000 rickettsiae at 48 and 144 hours, respectively. Independent of tick infection status, the degree of time-dependent inflammation was similar at 3 and 48 hpa. However, in R. parkeri-infected skin at 144 hpa, macrophages were the dominant cell type, with enhanced levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α while IL-10 production was reduced. The data suggest delayed pro-inflammatory activation in response to rickettsial infection when delivered by ticks. This study yields valuable insights into the early events of Rickettsia transmission and the host response, providing the basis for the development of preventive strategies against tick-borne rickettsial disease.

Indexed as

AmblyommaRickettsiaRickettsia InfectionsSkinSpotted Fever Group RickettsiosisAnimalsFemaleMiceTicks

Identifiers

PMID42804524
PMCPMC13638046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.