ArticlePloS one2026
Integration of the Integrated Emergency Surgical Officers (IESO) initiative within the health system: Perspectives of non-physician surgeons in Ethiopia's Tigray region.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTask-shifting and task-sharing are strategies for redistributing or collaboratively delivering clinical tasks within health workforce teams to address shortages and expand access. In Ethiopia, Integrated Emergency Surgical Officers (IESOs) were introduced to provide emergency obstetric and essential surgical care in underserved areas. In Tigray, conflict-related damage, displacement, workforce attrition, and disruption of referral and training systems intensified pre-existing surgical workforce shortages. Evidence on how IESOs have been integrated, supported, and retained in this fragile health-system context remains limited. This study assessed the status and experiences of IESOs in Tigray and identified strategies for strengthening their integration and retention.
methodsWe conducted a concurrent mixed-methods study in November 2024. Of the 84 IESOs practising in Tigray, 59 attended the region-wide safe-cesarean-delivery training and all 59 completed the survey, giving a 100% response rate among invtied participants and representing 70.2% of practising IESOs in the region. Two focus group discussions with nine participants each and five in-depth interviews were conducted. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively using R version 4.2.2, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Findings were integrated through triangulation and a joint display.
resultsParticipants worked across general hospitals, primary hospitals, and health centers. Most strongly agreed that IESOs contributed to reducing maternal mortality, 54(91.5%) and perinatal or neonatal mortality 48 (88.1%). The proportions who were very likely to remain in the profession declined from 31 (52.5%) at three years to 24 (40.7%) at five years and 7 (11.9%) at ten years, demonstrating a pronounced projected retention cliff. Resource shortages, limited managerial recognition, inter-professional conflict, and absent career-progression pathways were the dominant challenges, whereas community acceptance and the opportunity to initiate lifesaving services in remote settings were major sources of motivation.
conclusionIESOs extend emergency obstetric and surgical services to underserved communities in Tigray, but their long-term retention is precarious. A sustainable program requires a nationally and regionally defined scope of practice, an appropriate salary and professional grading structure, funded continuing professional development, formal IESO specialization or advanced clinical career pathways, reliable surgical supplies and infrastructure, and structured collaborative governance with surgeons and obstetrician-gynecologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.