ArticlePloS one2026
Investigation of age- and sex-related changes in cancellous bone density in the human spine using CT.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies of cancellous bone density across all spinal segments in relation to age and sex remain limited. This investigation aimed to quantify vertebral cancellous bone density in Hounsfield units (HU), to explore age‑ and sex‑related bone loss, and to compare HU measurements with bone mineral density (BMD) and bone volume fraction (BV/TV). Cancellous bone density was assessed in 71 spines (CT) covering vertebrae C3-L5 and the age range from 4 to 102 years. HU values were derived from mid‑vertebral regions, and in addition, BMD (L1-L3) and BV/TV measurements (Th12-L2, micro‑CT, 50 spines) in broad subsets of samples. The association between bone density and age was investigated by HU profiles along the spine in age groups and by regression approaches. HU values decreased with age (p < 0.001) and from cranial to caudal levels (p < 0.001), for both sexes (p < 0.001), with a marked reduction at the thoracolumbar junction beyond 60 years. Regression and cluster analyses revealed two phases of HU density loss with ongoing age, the second occurring in women (older than 64 years), later than in men (after 56 years) (p < 0.001). HU values were correlated with BMD (r = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.72-0.94) and with BV/TV (r = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.17-0.75). Density loss of bone with age is significant for BMD (for both sexes, p < 0.001) and for BV/TV (p ≤ 0.021), too, with an earlier reduction detected in the microarchitecture. These findings highlight the need for sex‑specific assessment and prevention strategies in osteoporosis research and clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.