Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42804444›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026

Distinct Environmental DNA States Reveal Biodiversity and Transport Patterns Across Alpine Watersheds.

Anish Kirtane, Enrico van der Loo, Zora Doppmann, Kristy Deiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anish KirtaneInstitute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8898-4275
Enrico van der LooInstitute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3178-2589
Zora DoppmannInstitute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4886-9261
Kristy DeinerInstitute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9755-3223

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 852621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) exists in three states: membrane-bound, adsorbed and dissolved. These states differ in persistence and degradation, strongly influencing the interpretation of eDNA data. Despite this, they have rarely been separated and analyzed independently from environmental samples. We developed a state-sorting workflow to isolate and analyze them, applying it to samples from 221 sites from 58 streams across eight lake watersheds with COI and ITS metabarcoding, targeting metazoans and plants, respectively, to reveal differences in biodiversity content and transport dynamics. Our results show that all three states contain both shared and unique taxonomic diversity of metazoan eDNA. However, the plant eDNA was only detected in the membrane-bound state. For metazoans, membrane-bound eDNA contained 87.8% of observed ASVs, far exceeding the adsorbed (37.2%) and dissolved (20.5%) states. Only membrane-bound eDNA showed evidence of downstream transport, but its extent varied among watersheds due to local hydrology. While upstream eDNA was transported to stream-lake confluences, lake surface samples showed a turnover in community composition. Clarifying the fate of membrane-bound eDNA within lakes will enhance catchment-level detection from lake samples and understanding of lake hydrodynamics. Of the environmental parameters assessed, water temperature was most strongly aligned with changes in community composition between sites. Most previous studies have likely captured the majority of the eDNA diversity within their samples by inadvertently targeting the membrane-bound state. This study demonstrates the utility of eDNA state-sorting, but the methods require further refinement. Analyzing states independently improves the interpretation of eDNA data and elucidates the processes governing eDNA fate and transport.

Indexed as

BiodiversityDNA, EnvironmentalRiversAnimalsDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicExtrachromosomal DNALakesMetagenomicsPlantsDNA, EnvironmentalExtrachromosomal DNAbiodiversityeDNAmetabarcodingstate‐sortingtransport

Identifiers

PMID42804444
PMCPMC13618895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.