Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42804205›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Gun and Other Weapon-Involved Intimate Partner Violence and Psychiatric Symptoms.

Tyson Whitten, Kimberlie Dean, Alvin Kuowei Tay, Batool Moussa, Fatima Hassoun, Jane Fisher, Melissa J Green, Susan J Rees

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tyson WhittenSchool of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kimberlie DeanDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Alvin Kuowei TayDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Batool MoussaDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Fatima HassounDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jane FisherGlobal and Women's Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Melissa J GreenDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Susan J ReesDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Gun, knife, or other weapon involvement in intimate partner violence (IPV) may indicate heightened actual and perceived lethality and coercive control, but its mental health impacts on survivors are poorly understood after accounting for other IPV and prior mental health symptoms. Objective: To estimate the adjusted association between gun and other weapon-involved IPV and symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD), panic disorder (PD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and adult separation anxiety disorder (ASAD), accounting for concurrent and past nonweapon physical IPV, psychological abuse, and prior symptom levels. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, longitudinal cohort study with 6 waves at 12- to 18-month intervals recruited participants from January 1, 2015, to March 31, 2016, from public antenatal clinics in Sydney and Melbourne, Australia. Women with exposure and outcome data from at least 2 waves were eligible for the study. Data analysis was conducted in February 2025. Exposures: Past-year gun and other weapon-involved IPV, nonweapon physical IPV, and psychological abuse. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [Fourth Edition]) symptom counts for MDD, PD, PTSD, and ASAD at each wave. β-Binomial (β̂) mixed-effects models with random intercepts modeled bounded symptom counts, adjusting for survey wave, lagged symptoms, and covariates. Pooled marginal and within-person transition contrasts were estimated using parametric simulation. Results: Among 1114 women (mean [SD] age at wave 1, 29.48 [5.42] years), 585 (52.5%) were migrants; median birth year was 1987 (range, 1969-1999). Across follow-up, 43 women (3.9%) reported gun or other weapon-involved IPV, 171 (15.4%) nonweapon physical IPV, and 726 (65.2%) psychological abuse. In fully adjusted models, weapon-involved IPV remained associated with PD (β̂ = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.08-1.50) and PTSD (β̂ = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.38-1.76) but not MDD (β̂ = 0.12; 95% CI, -0.55 to 0.79) or ASAD (β̂ = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.81 to 0.57). Adjusted pooled marginal differences were 0.57 (95% CI, 0.04-1.44) for PD and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.17-1.59) for PTSD; within-person transition effects were 1.12 (95% CI, 0.08-2.24) for PD and 1.14 (95% CI, 0.26-2.02) for PTSD. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, gun and other weapon-involved IPV was independently associated with higher PD and PTSD symptom counts after controlling for other IPV types and prior mental health. Identifying weapon-involved IPV should alert clinicians to fear-related presentations and prompt safety-focused interventions.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceMental DisordersWeaponsAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMajor Depressive DisorderPanic DisorderProspective StudiesStress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

Identifiers

PMID42804205
PMCPMC13621252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.