ArticleJAMA internal medicine2026
Fasting Duration and Differences Across Routine Laboratory Tests.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Fasting before blood collection is widely practiced to reduce preanalytical variability, yet whether fasting-related differences are clinically meaningful across a broad panel of routine analytes has not been systematically evaluated using clinical data. Objective: To evaluate whether fasting duration is associated with routine laboratory test results and whether observed differences exceed established analytical performance specifications (APS). Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective single-center cross-sectional study using laboratory information system data collected between February 2021 and December 2023 from a single 670-bed secondary-care university hospital in the Seoul metropolitan area, Republic of Korea. All samples were drawn from outpatients at the institution's central phlebotomy unit. Participants were adult outpatients (≥18 years) with documented fasting duration. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2024, to July 24, 2026. Exposure: Fasting duration derived from the time elapsed between the patient's last meal and blood collection, categorized as less than 8 hours, 8 to 12 hours, and more than 12 hours. Main Outcomes and Measures: Adjusted means across fasting groups were estimated using linear mixed-effects models with patient-level random intercepts, adjusting for age, sex, and department. Paired within-person analyses among repeatedly tested patients were performed to minimize between-patient confounding. Differences were compared with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine biological variation-based total allowable error. Postprandial trends within the subgroup fasting less than 8 hours were assessed at 30-minute intervals. Results: The final dataset comprised 9 755 547 test results from 101 148 patients across 372 test items. Between-group comparisons identified APS-exceeding differences for 27 analytes. However, only 10 were confirmed in paired within-person analyses, suggesting confounding. Glucose (10.8%), triglycerides (20.1%), γ-glutamyl transferase (14.8%), and lipase (36.4%) were higher with less than 8 hours fasting. No analyte exceeded APS between the 8- to 12-hour and more than 12-hour groups. Within the less than 8-hour subgroup, glucose and lactate decreased significantly with increasing fasting duration, whereas lipid concentrations showed no significant linear trend. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that fasting duration was associated with differences exceeding analytical performance specifications for only a few analytes, mainly glucose, triglycerides, γ-glutamyl transferase, and lipase. No estimable within-person difference between the 8- to 12-hour and more than 12-hour groups exceeded an available APS. These findings support analyte-specific rather than uniform fasting requirements.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.