Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42804172›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Differences in Dietary-Related Experiences, Determinants, and Information-Seeking Behaviors Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Janine P M Faessen, Desiree A Lucassen, Edith J M Feskens, Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janine P M FaessenDepartment of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, Wageningen, 6708 WE, The Netherlands, 31 (0) 317 - 480080.ORCID 0000-0002-0685-6462
Desiree A LucassenDepartment of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, Wageningen, 6708 WE, The Netherlands, 31 (0) 317 - 480080.ORCID 0000-0001-9769-6566
Edith J M FeskensDepartment of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, Wageningen, 6708 WE, The Netherlands, 31 (0) 317 - 480080.ORCID 0000-0001-5819-2488
Elske M Brouwer-BrolsmaDepartment of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, Wageningen, 6708 WE, The Netherlands, 31 (0) 317 - 480080.ORCID 0000-0002-6829-5090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiple studies have highlighted the prevalence of suboptimal dietary patterns during pregnancy and the postpartum period, with some studies indicating factors that influence dietary behaviors. Objective: This study aimed to map the differences in dietary-related experiences, determinants, and information-seeking behaviors, focusing on app use, during the pregnancy and postpartum periods among Dutch women. Methods: In total, 1619 women recruited via social media filled in an online questionnaire consisting of 32 multiple-choice, 2 ranking, 11 rating, and 20 open-ended questions covering demographics, dietary-related activities during pregnancy and the postpartum period, determinants of these activities, and information-seeking behaviors focusing on app use. Questions were specific to pregnancy or postpartum, and responses were compared using chi-square tests, ANOVA, or 2-tailed Results: We obtained data from 842 pregnant and 777 postpartum women. Mean age was 32 (SD 4) years, mean self-reported prepregnancy BMI was 25 (SD 5) kg/m², and most participants were highly educated (1214/1619, 75.0%). Pregnant and postpartum women valued healthy nutrition (mean 8.5, SD 1.2 on a 10-point scale). Pregnant women rated their food enjoyment and diet quality lowest during the first trimester, with scores of 6.3 (SD 2.5) and 6.3 (SD 1.9) out of 10, respectively. Compared with pregnant women, postpartum women had less phase-specific nutritional knowledge (354/745, 47.5% vs 533/820, 65.0%), less time for food preparation (365/726, 50.3% vs 618/803, 77.0%), and less time for eating (524/721, 72.7% vs 773/799, 96.7%), but were more eager to learn about phase-specific healthy food choices (313/745, 42.0% vs 234/820, 28.5%) and felt more capable of food preparation (mean 7.3 SD 2.2 vs mean 6.9, SD 2.2). During pregnancy, the main reason for eating was the child's health, while in postpartum, the main reason was hunger. Key sources of nutrition information were websites (1337/1565, 85.4%), health care professionals (805/1565, 51.4%), and apps (665/1565, 42.5%). Phase-specific app use dropped from 90.8% (713/785) during pregnancy to 58.9% (418/710) postpartum, with many women being unaware of the existence of postpartum apps. Important factors to consider for app use included credibility, ease of use, and free access. Conclusions: Our results highlighted significant differences in dietary-related experiences, determinants, and information-seeking behaviors between pregnant and postpartum women, underscoring the need for tailored dietary support tools for each phase. The limited availability of postpartum nutrition resources, such as apps, highlighted the need to develop improved digital nutritional counseling solutions.

Indexed as

DietInformation Seeking BehaviorPostpartum PeriodPregnant PeopleAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansNetherlandsPregnancySurveys and Questionnairesappsdietary supportmaternal dietmHealthmobile healthnutritionpostpartumpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42804172
PMCPMC13618406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.